Paul Timmins (noweb4u) wrote,
Paul Timmins

  • Mood:
[noweb4u] see the telco people doesn't want to relinquish central control either. They want the switch to do everything. I mean they nailed up a circuit inthe switch to do my ISDN in waterford.
[noweb4u] they nailed it to a interconnect going to pontiac main, where the ISDN signalling was done
[xxxxxxxx] I don't think it's actually in the switch, that would be pretty silly.. cuz it would drop every time the SM reset.
[noweb4u] the 1a wasn't capable. They weren't gonna install ISDN repeaters every few thousand feet on the pair to pontiac main, I'm sure it was somewhere in the switch
[xxxxxxxx] It might be easier to do it there, in terms of getting it onto the interoffice trunk, because they might not have a 0/1 DACS on the appropriate line to do the add/drop.
[noweb4u] and you're also accusing Ameritech of doing The Right Thing(SM), which we all know they take offense to.
[xxxxxxxx] What I mean is, they probably run it over a d4 channel bank or something, back to Main. The nailed-up connection is in that /office/ but not in that /switch/
[noweb4u] maybe. Team data said what I said was right, but we all know what Team data is smoking.
[xxxxxxx] Who knows..
[noweb4u] It's ameritech, they probably hired a squirrel with a smartmedia strapped to it to run the distance from PNTCMIMN to PNTCMIWS to do the signalling for the D channel.
[xxxxxxxx] Wouldn't surprise me.. Budget cutbacks changed it to a shrew.
[noweb4u] hehe bearer channels are done with sloths
[noweb4u] They add acceptable latency by injecting it with cocaine
[noweb4u] "And this children, is how your call to grandma's house really works behind the scenes."

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.