?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry



Apparently I did something that upset the facebook gods.

They claim it was either:
* photos that attack a person or group (don't know of any)
* nudity (not really)
* drug use (nope)
* violence (they left my photo of me brandishing firearms untouched...)

Of course they won't tell me what they were, so how am I supposed to know what to avoid?

The only thing I can think of is that there were some photos of Becky breastfeeding the boy in the NICU.

Apparently kids eating is indecent now? What? Not like I was showing full on boobs or anything, I've seen more revealed people walking down the street.

Comments

( 15 comments — Leave a comment )
bjserven
Apr. 27th, 2010 05:13 am (UTC)
They use an automated scanning algorithm. Its not fool proof - earlier today a friend's picture of her standing in front of Niagara falls and another of her standing in her yard with her horse were both taken down for the same thing. I assure you no one flagged those, LOL.
noweb4u
Apr. 27th, 2010 05:23 am (UTC)
their algorithm goes after people eating, leaves my brandishing of real actual firearms in what appear to be reckless ways (but in fact are a camera trick) intact?

Back to the drawing board.
jayj79
Apr. 27th, 2010 07:48 am (UTC)
it's like how on TV, they can show all sorts of violence and whatnot and nobody bats an eye.

Yet if there is one hint of a (female) nipple or something, all hell breaks loose.

We have a constitutional amendment that gives us the right to bear arms,
well I think we need another one that gives us a right to bare boobies. ;op

Okay, enough bad jokes. It is totally ridiculous how the boob nazis crack down on that, even when the situation in question is totally non-sexual and very natural, such as breastfeeding a baby.
noweb4u
Apr. 27th, 2010 05:24 am (UTC)
http://shutupwomangetonmyhorse.com/ ???? maybe that's the horse problem?
sideband
Apr. 27th, 2010 06:16 am (UTC)
That's worse than the hamster dance.
kadiera
Apr. 27th, 2010 01:14 pm (UTC)
Yes, facebook believes breastfeeding is indecent. It's kinda like the LJ debacle over breastfeeding icons a while back
noweb4u
Apr. 27th, 2010 01:18 pm (UTC)
Ironically they had no problems with the bathtub photos where my boy was protected from the world by nothing more than a baby washcloth, nor the photo of him and his mom showering together (with no genitals showing)
noweb4u
Apr. 27th, 2010 01:19 pm (UTC)
borderline c/p: ok
brandishing firearms: ok
eating: not ok

How did these people get on MY internets?
kadiera
Apr. 27th, 2010 01:46 pm (UTC)
They *are* rather screwed up, aren't they?
wesmills
Apr. 27th, 2010 04:43 pm (UTC)
All the more reason to go to IPv6, and make it as technically difficult as possible to do so...
noweb4u
Apr. 28th, 2010 12:37 am (UTC)
doing my best here to keep them off my internets

paul@pichu:~$ traceroute6 www.clearrate.com
traceroute to www.clearrate.com (2607:f4b8:1:20:213:72ff:fe59:49ea), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets
1 eth3.psyduck.timminstechnologies.com (2607:f4b8:2600:7::1) 1.768 ms 3.103 ms 4.311 ms
2 timmins-t1-r.ipv6.clearrate.com (2607:f4b8:ffff:fff0::1) 23.364 ms 23.833 ms 24.544 ms
3 2607:f4b8:1:1:20e:38ff:fe80:1dbf (2607:f4b8:1:1:20e:38ff:fe80:1dbf) 26.310 ms 26.926 ms 28.490 ms
4 ns1.clearrate.com (2607:f4b8:1:20:213:72ff:fe59:49ea) 27.062 ms 27.888 ms 29.174 ms
paul@pichu:~$
wesmills
Apr. 28th, 2010 12:58 am (UTC)
Me, too! (Except that my colo provider doesn't have native IPv6 so I had to dig a tunnel)

wesmills@phoenix:~$ traceroute6 -l www.clearrate.com
traceroute6 to hosting.clearrate.com (2607:f4b8:1:20:213:72ff:fe59:49ea) from 2001:470:1f0e:497::2, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 cheatv6-2.tunnel.tserv8.dal1.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:1f0e:497::1) 7.465 ms 7.437 ms 6.322 ms
2 gige-g2-14.core1.dal1.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:0:78::1) 5.534 ms 15.464 ms 7.038 ms
3 10gigabitethernet5-2.core1.ash1.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:0:3b::2) 41.012 ms 41.536 ms 50.180 ms
4 100m-0-0.ash.ipv6.he.net (2001:470:0:40::1) 40.457 ms 41.585 ms 40.792 ms
5 s1-vl101.sfldmidi.clearrate.com (2607:f4b8:1:1:20e:38ff:fe80:1dbf) 81.389 ms 86.276 ms 81.946 ms
6 ns1.clearrate.com (2607:f4b8:1:20:213:72ff:fe59:49ea) 81.968 ms 81.189 ms 81.349 ms
noweb4u
Apr. 28th, 2010 01:26 am (UTC)
if you coloed at $employer you wouldn't have that problem since it's native ipv6 throughout
wesmills
Apr. 28th, 2010 05:58 pm (UTC)
Very true, and when we[1] look into buying new hardware, I'm going to push for consideration of that. :) Does $employer have KVMoIP?

[1] And by "we," I mean the non-profit coop we're setting up. :D
noweb4u
Apr. 29th, 2010 05:56 am (UTC)
we don't have kvmoip, no. But you're free to colocate one. :)

What I found is awesome is either xen or vmware esxi (starting to prefer vmware more for a number of little reasons)

Both of those basically allow you to kvm the hosts you care about with minimal fuss.
( 15 comments — Leave a comment )